Cassation Rejected, Sentenced to 14 Years by Lawyer Ronald Tannur Inkrah

Clubnet Digital Clubnet Branding Identity Marketing

Jakarta, hitclubapk3 Indonesia

The Supreme Court (MA) rejected the cassation filed by defendant Lisa Rachmat regarding the bribery case with Gregorius’ acquittal
Ronald Tannur
.
Thus, the sentence of 14 years in prison against Lisa in the case of criminal conspiracy accompanied by bribery of the judge has obtained binding legal force or inkrah.
“Decision: Reject the appeal of the PU (Public Prosecutor) and the defendant,” reads the decision as quoted on the Supreme Court Registrar’s website on Sunday (21/12).
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Case number: 12346 K/PID.SUS/2025 was examined and tried by the chairman of the panel of supreme judges led by Jupriyadi together with two member judges, Sinintha Yuliansih Sibarani and Suradi on Friday, December 19 2025. Substitute Registrar Nur Kholida Dwi Wati.
Previously, the DKI Jakarta High Court (PT) aggravated Lisa Rachmat’s sentence in the case of bribery of a judge at the Surabaya District Court (PN) and an evil conspiracy to bribe a cassation judge to arrange the acquittal of Ronald Tannur, who was her client.
The panel of appeals judges sentenced Lisa Rachmat to 14 years in prison.The sentence is 3 years heavier than the decision of the Central Jakarta Corruption Court which sentenced him to 11 years in prison.
Apart from that, the judge imposed a fine on Lisa of Rp. 750 million, subsidiary to 6 months in prison.
Lisa’s case at the appeal level was tried by the chairman of the panel of judges, Teguh Harianto, with members Budi Susilo and Hotma Maya Marbun.The appeal decision was read out in a hearing open to the public on Thursday, August 28 2025.
The appeals panel of judges was of the opinion that the legal considerations of the first instance court were based on appropriate and correct reasons.
Apart from that, it has also been considered sufficiently and comprehensively.
Therefore, the PT Jakarta panel of judges took over these legal considerations, and used them as their own legal considerations in deciding Lisa’s case.
However, the panel of judges at the appellate level disagreed regarding the length of the sentence imposed by the panel of judges at the first level against the defendant Lisa.
“Because it is seen as not reflecting the spirit of eradicating criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, which is increasingly massive and occurs at all levels, and does not have a deterrent effect and does not have a general deterrent effect,” said the PT DKI judge.
“Considering that therefore the panel of judges at the appellate level will change the decision of the panel of judges at the first level only regarding the length of the sentence to be imposed on the defendant which will be stated in the verdict,” he continued.
Lisa together with Meirizka Widjaja (Ronald Tannur’s mother) are said to have bribed the Surabaya District Court panel of judges, namely Erintuah Damanik, Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo in connection with the handling of the murder case of Dini Sera Afriyanti.The amount of bribe money was IDR 1 billion and Sin$ 308,000.
The crime occurred between January and August 2024.
Through this bribe, Ronald Tannur was acquitted by Erintuah Damanik et al based on the Surabaya District Court decision Number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby dated July 24 2024.
As for Lisa, she together with former Supreme Court official Zarof Ricar are also said to have carried out an evil conspiracy to give or promise something in the form of IDR 5 billion to the chairman of the Supreme Court cassation panel, Supreme Court Judge Soesilo.
This effort was intended to influence the judge hearing the cassation case to hand down an acquittal against Ronald Tannur in accordance with the decision of the Surabaya District Court (PN) Number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby dated July 24 2024.
At this cassation stage, the Supreme Court overturned Ronald Tannur’s acquittal and sentenced him to five years in prison.The chairman of the cassation panel, Soesilo, has a different opinion or dissenting opinion.
According to him, Ronald Tannur should be released from the prosecutor’s charges.
(ryn/gil)
[Gambas:hitclubapk3 Video]

Read More: Can you watch Avatar Fire and Ash without watching the previous one?

Read More: US and Russia Meet in Miami to Discuss Ending Ukraine War

Kamu mungkin juga menyukai: